Get help to make life better
Life Scholar β€’ World Author
Art Curator β€’ Tech Strategist
Soul Uplifter β€’ Sport Analyst

Tennis 5 Sets To 4 Games Act

I wonder if the grand slam or major tournaments in tennis should change to be a best of 5 sets to only 4 games per set, for both men and women.

What

  • Play best of 5 sets to 4 games for men at major tournaments
  • Play best of 5 sets to 4 games for women at majors as well
  • All other rules including tiebreak lengths remain the same
  • Regular tournaments can remain best of 3 sets to 6 games
  • Maximum games for men would decrease from 60 to 40
  • Maximum games for women would increase from 36 to 40

Why

  • Men's matches at majors can be too long and boring to watch
  • Service break in men's tennis can make 6 game sets predictable
  • Men's majors are too physically demanding with 5 sets to 6 games
  • Women may now be able to handle 5 set matches to 4 games
  • Intensity of matches may increase due to breaks and shorter sets
  • Men's and women's majors could have the exact same format

NBA Draft Picks 2026

Here are the potential draft picks and players that I like for the 2026 NBA draft.

Primary - Great, draft for my team

  1. Cameron Boozer
  2. Keaton Wagler
  3. Cameron Carr
  4. Hannes Steinbach
  5. Allen Graves
  6. Ryan Conwell
  7. Braden Smith
  8. Fletcher Loyer

Secondary - Great, draft for some team

  1. Yaxel Lendeborg
  2. Christian Anderson
  3. Sergio De Larrea
  4. Chris Cenac Jr.
  5. Zuby Ejiofor
  6. Otega Oweh
  7. Milos Uzan
  8. Tyler Nickel

Create School Subject Called Life

I think we should create a full class in secondary schools and a subject of classes in universities called Life, which teaches and simplifies life improvement and wellbeing skills to help make all people's lives and society as a whole better and happier.

What

  • Productivity and Tasks - Getting Things Done, 7 Habits Of Highly Effective People
  • Improvement and Goals - Think And Grow Rich, The Magic Of Thinking Big, Mindset
  • Positivity and Happiness - The Power Of Positive Thinking, As A Man Thinketh
  • Simplicity and Peace - Don't Sweat The Small Stuff, The Untethered Soul
  • Routine and Habits - The Power Of Habit, Atomic Habits, Meditations
  • Mindfulness and Focus - The Power Of Now, Flow, Wherever You Go There You Are
  • Social and Relationships - How To Talk To Anyone, How To Win Friends And...
  • Health and Fitness - Fitness For Dummies, Eat Drink And Be Healthy, Why We Sleep

June 8th, 2026

Do Whatever Makes Our Lives Better

Some of the people I find most fascinating have publicly straddled the line or gone back and forth between trying to improve work or productivity and life or wellbeing. I innately admire this kind of person, and I applaud anyone who wants to do things to makes our lives better.

  • Leo Babauta - Created Zen Habits website and blog where he writes and teaches about productivity, improvement, and personal development, but also about being healthy, achieving happiness, and simplifying your life. (Zen Habits)
  • Gina Trapani - Created LifeHacker website and blog where she straddled the line between writing about useful tips and tools to make life and work better, and works as a software developer and designer creating tools to make work and life better. (Note To Self)
  • Derek Sivers - Created CD Baby business by following his technical interests after working as a musician following his artistic interests. Created Derek Sivers website blog and books to help people improve their life, work, music, and technology. (Derek Sivers)
  • Belle Cooper - Created Hello Code business and works as a software developer making apps that help with journaling, logging, and keeping track of life and work. Writes and journals about life and work at various websites and her blog. (Belle B. Cooper)
  • Tim Ferriss - Created The 4-Hour Workweek and Tools of Titans books focused on work and productivity, and The 4-Hour Body and 4-Hour Chef focused on life and health. Created and invests in businesses, and created educational podcast. (Tim Ferriss)
  • Penelope Trunk - Created Penelope Trunk website and blog to write candidly and openly about all aspects of careers, education, life, and struggles. Teaches, coaches, and provides courses to help people with careers, education, life, and writing. (Penelope Trunk)
  • Bill Gates - Created Microsoft business to improve work and productivity technology and software which made him a lot of money, and created a foundation to improve life and health resources and research which made him a lot of money. (Gates Notes)
  • Oprah Winfrey - Created The Oprah Winfrey Show and subsequent media network that entertained people, but made the choice to also educate people with positive information and stories to make your life better, which made her rich and famous. (Oprah)

June 7th, 2026

Raptors Offseason Strategy Path 2026

Here is my overall strategy and roster construction ideas for the Toronto Raptors 2026 offseason and going forward, including possible lineup changes and potential trade ideas.

What

  • Improve 3PT/FT shooting of all players around Barnes/Murray into future
  • Improve height, rebounding, defense, and eventually 3PT shooting at center
  • Center - Get tall starting center(s) to rebound and defend, hope 3PT potential
  • Point - Get young backup or fringe PG that shoots 3PT, rebounds, passes
  • Continue trading for young players to get team of 2-Way shooters/defenders
  • Sign cheap centers if just rebounds/defense, play Murray/Barnes center rarely

Players

  • Barrett - Trade for young prospect player(s), draft picks, maybe center
  • Shead - Trade possibly and get a better shooting and rebounding PG
  • Poeltl - Keep and move to bench to trade salary at future date, or use in trade
  • Ingram - Keep for 3PT shooting, late clock scoring, and team consistency
  • Walter - Promote to starting lineup at SG, Murray starters insurance 6th man
  • Gradey - Keep as 11th guy, maybe don't extend, possibly trade at deadline

Lineup

  • PG - Quickley - [Trade 3/D] - Draft/FA
  • SG - Walter - Murray - Gradey
  • SF - Ingram - [Trade D/3] - Battle
  • PF - Barnes - Mamu - Draft/FA
  • C - [FA/Trade] - Poeltl - Draft/FA
  • Note - Battle at SG and Murray at SF if don't get D/3 wing upgrade

Trade Blueprint 1

  • Don't love center being high paid player, but maybe worth it here
  • Raptors - Barrett, Shead, Gradey, Mogbo
  • Thunder - Holmgren, Wallace

Trade Blueprint 2

  • Poeltl contract tough, but maybe OKC prefers him to trade later
  • Raptors - Barrett, Poeltl, Shead, Battle, Mogbo
  • Thunder - Holmgren, Wallace, Topic

Trade Blueprint 3

  • Improve shooting potential and continue with youth movement
  • Raptors - Barrett, Shead, Mogbo
  • Rockets - Sheppard, Smith, 2027 1st, 2026 2nd, 2027 2nd

Trade Blueprint 4

  • Get center with shooting potential, offensive PG, continue with youth
  • Raptors - Barrett, Shead, Battle, Mogbo
  • Heat - Ware, Jakucionis, Wiggins, 2026 1st

Trade Blueprint 5?

  • Get picks, starting no 3PT center, two solid guys who've won championship?
  • Raptors - Barrett, Shead, Jackson
  • Thunder - Wallace, Hartenstein, 2026 1st, 2 2027 1st Round, 4 2nd Round

Trade Blueprint 6?

  • Not "huge" myself on Sengun, as defense/shooting/slow, but maybe fits?
  • Raptors - Barrett, Shead, Gradey, Jackson
  • Rockets - Sheppard, Sengun

Be Careful What You Swish For Act

I wonder if more NBA rules created to discourage rebuilding and tanking results in "perverse incentives", and that reversing course to completely remove both the draft lottery and play-in tournament might be the simplest, best, or most natural order.

Draft

  • Flagg 1 (12th Last)
  • Risacher 1 (10th Last)
  • Wemby 1, Harper 2, Castle 4
  • Cade 1, Ausar 5, Ivey 5
  • Tatum 3, Brown 3, Smart 6
  • Wade 5, *James 1, *Bosh 4
  • Jordan 3, Pippen 5, Grant 10
  • Magic 1, Worthy 1, *Kareem 1

While the current NBA rule changes with the draft lottery and play-in tournament, as well as any further flattening of the draft lottery odds or other rule changes, are an attempt to combat a team rebuilding with homegrown talent and tanking or losing some games some years, it's possible the effects of these changes are worse and with other unexpected and negative consequences and natural reactions by teams that we have seen. It may be that great teams of the present and past had often naturally rebuilt to get one or two high draft picks or the possibility of a star player, and then they would go on to win or try to win for many years, including many of the top ranked, successful, and championship level teams of the past.

When you reward higher ranking and mid-level teams with an opportunity to both make the playoffs with the play-in tournament going to 10 teams and only 6 teams making it for sure, or get the number 1 pick in the draft with the randomized lottery draft odds, you may have incentivized even those mid-level teams to want to lose games, sit top players, trade franchise players like Doncic, miss the playoffs or play-in tournament on purpose, or make other decisions if they could get a #1 or top pick, or improve their odds for themselves by finishing 14th, or 12th, or 10th, or 8th last in the standings. If you take this even further and create more rules, other unforeseen perverse incentives may result, such as the current rich teams getting even richer or teams not having an opportunity to rebuild naturally, or other unforeseen future consequences from any new rules creating potentially perverse incentives.

Instead, before you had the possibly unfair lottery draft and the possibly unfair play-in tournament, the very bottom teams might try to lose some games to improve their draft position and likelihood of getting a great player and that has always naturally been the case, and that doesn't appear to have changed. Also, it was clear that the teams with the best records over 82 games made the playoffs and teams knew if they made the top 8 they were a playoff team, instead of a much worse team who could have even more than 10 more losses than another team. On top of this, the mid-level teams who just missed the playoffs or who were trying to get better weren't as obsessed at losing some games because the odds of getting a franchise player with the 8th pick isn't much better than the 10th pick, like is the case if you could possibly get the 1st, 3rd, or 5th pick.

Furthermore, I have to add that I suspect it's quite possible that the NBA and its executives and owners might be particularly more upset today in 2026 at teams who might try to lose some games when they are at the bottom of the league or aren't a playoff team, which has likely been going on forever and with successful results since the 1950s, because of their recent decision to make money from gambling and betting, and the consequences lower and mid-level teams trying to lose some games or sit out players has for that. While a separate topic, I will briefly say that I at least hope and meditate for the current and future health and wellbeing of all of the referees, players, and coaches who may be very negatively affected by betting in the game as well as the countless people being negatively affected or becoming addicted to gambling which may ruin many people's lives and their children's lives, instead of enjoying the sport for the love of the game, because of the NBA's decision to allow rampant and pervasive betting to make even more excessive amounts of money, and the government's resistance to stop widespread legalized gambling by businesses such as the NBA up to this point.

Perverse Incentive - Wikipedia

Famous Buddha Paradox

If Buddha was content doing nothing, then "Why is Buddha so famous?"

  • If Buddha thought that living a life in which you don't need to do anything, make any improvements, or strive for any purpose was most rewarding or the best way to live, then why is he so famous and how did he produce many teachings which are so well-known?
  • Could it be because he followed his passions, sometimes strived to make things better with his ideas, found ways to potentially be of service for others, spent time doing and working on things he enjoyed, and even gained recognition from others for his work?
  • If Buddha was truly happy and content with just existing, meditating, and sitting in nature all of the time, then I wonder if we would not know him at all, let alone recognize him as such a famous and great writer, teacher, and philosopher.
  • I wonder if he may have really enjoyed his purpose or role as a teacher and philosopher, and spent a good deal of time learning and teaching how to live a better life, which resulted in him creating and writing many teachings on enlightenment and other ideas.
  • I admit my ignorance that I am not a master scholar of Buddha's teachings. Of course I understand he taught many different ideas including the Middle Way of finding a balance, and I know that he didn't actually teach everyone to just "sit in nature all day".
  • This was simply inspired by my ignorant image of him sitting in nature all day being content, and wondering if he might not be so famous if he did not follow his own passions and get some enjoyment from or even attachment to the purposes, roles, practices, or habits he did in his life.

February 18th, 2026

Raptors Need PG Upgrade?

Hey Raptors Report.

Thanks a lot for replying to me and others, and sharing your thoughts and evaluation on Quickley and everything else, it's so enjoyable to listen to such an intelligent and well researched person like you talk about Raptors and basketball! Again, I admit I didn't even watch this particular video so I'm not debating specific things you said in it, and for instance upgrading to prime Curry straight up from Quickley might be worth it.

While I'm nitpicking words a bit, one thing I have learned to try and do is to not assume what others are thinking or that everyone sees things the same as I do or the current consensus does. As an example, there may be people that might not even recognize Quickley as struggling much this year, and might evaluate the situation differently. Because of adding Ingram he is the 4th option on the team and is playing unselfish, he's shooting a career high 52% 2PT, a respectable 36% 3PT the same as LaMelo Ball, an excellent and career high 3.7/1 AST/TO, a career high 1.3 STL, he plays much harder on defense and makes less money than many PG who one might consider upgrades, and he has a solid 17 PPG, which is lower because of him being the 4th option and not taking way more shots or steal the ball away from RJ more like VanVleet would have done.

Beyond that, as you know, some people put less value into smaller or recent sample sizes and would evaluate players much more over the 3 previous seasons than the first 20 or 40 games of a current season, and his trajectory at the same age has been so much better than Lowry, even though it probably won't continue with him becoming the #2 option next year like Lowry did in his age 27 season. Thanks again for doing an amazing job, it's always great to hear your thoughts on everything!

Lowry vs. Quickley Ages 24-26
- AGE - PT/36 - 3P% - 2P%
- 24 - 14.2 - 38% - 46% - Lowry
- 25 - 16.0 - 37% - 43% - Lowry
- 26 - 14.1 - 36% - 43% - Lowry
- 24 - 21.0 - 40% - 47% - Quickley
- 25 - 22.1 - 38% - 47% - Quickley
- 26 - 18.2 - 36% - 51% - Quickley


"He had an excellent game, no doubt. I’m sure even a fan of his would recognize his struggles this season, however. I will sing his praises from the rooftops if he continues to play well! I’d like to see more than a game before I turn around completely."


"Hold my beer." - Immanuel Quickley

Don't worry, I'm just an ignorant commenter who just read the title and I haven't even watched the video yet, and might not and instead just wait for the devil's advocate video about Quickley's ridiculously amazing game and how he's a pretty good player for a 4th or 5th option, like Lowry was in 2012/13 when he averaged only 11.6 PTS before Bargnani and Gay were both traded the next year opening up a unique opportunity for him, which may not ever happen for Quickley but that's OK too.


Toronto Raptors Need An Upgrade At PG - Raptors Report